<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Is This The King of Reverse Mortgages?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.bestreversemortgage.com/is-this-the-king-of-reverse-mortgages/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.bestreversemortgage.com/is-this-the-king-of-reverse-mortgages/</link>
	<description>The Unofficial Guide to Reverse Mortgages</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 06 Feb 2012 06:43:48 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.1</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Peter Miller</title>
		<link>http://www.bestreversemortgage.com/is-this-the-king-of-reverse-mortgages/comment-page-1/#comment-8</link>
		<dc:creator>Peter Miller</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 21 Jun 2007 18:54:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bestreversemortgage.com/reverse-mortgage/is-this-the-king-of-reverse-mortgages/#comment-8</guid>
		<description>Maria --

Thanks for your note.

As the original posting says, &quot;as always with any reverse mortgage product, speak with an attorney who specializes in elder law for specific advice.&quot;

In the case of a loss it sure doesn&#039;t sound like the people at Rex are getting 3.5 percent for every 1 percent they put in.

As to the term &quot;king,&quot; it&#039;s a play on words. The name &quot;Rex&quot; means &quot;king&quot; in Latin. See: &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.thinkbabynames.com/meaning/1/Rex&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;http://www.thinkbabynames.com/meaning/1/Rex&lt;/a&gt;.

As always in these situations, the blog is a commentary and not an endorsement -- thus the note to see a specialist in elder law.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Maria &#8211;</p>
<p>Thanks for your note.</p>
<p>As the original posting says, &#8220;as always with any reverse mortgage product, speak with an attorney who specializes in elder law for specific advice.&#8221;</p>
<p>In the case of a loss it sure doesn&#8217;t sound like the people at Rex are getting 3.5 percent for every 1 percent they put in.</p>
<p>As to the term &#8220;king,&#8221; it&#8217;s a play on words. The name &#8220;Rex&#8221; means &#8220;king&#8221; in Latin. See: <a href="http://www.thinkbabynames.com/meaning/1/Rex" rel="nofollow">http://www.thinkbabynames.com/meaning/1/Rex</a>.</p>
<p>As always in these situations, the blog is a commentary and not an endorsement &#8212; thus the note to see a specialist in elder law.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Maria</title>
		<link>http://www.bestreversemortgage.com/is-this-the-king-of-reverse-mortgages/comment-page-1/#comment-7</link>
		<dc:creator>Maria</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 19 Jun 2007 13:21:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bestreversemortgage.com/reverse-mortgage/is-this-the-king-of-reverse-mortgages/#comment-7</guid>
		<description>King?   I don&#039;t think so.

Rex will loan a maximum of 15% of FMV.  They charge a $15,000 service fee at time of sale.   They get an equity share of 3.5% for every 1% they loan you.  No interest accrues, but if you get the maximum of 15%, this can mean up to 52% of your equity over time (15 X 3.5).

In California, this can be a whopper.   Correct me if I am wrong, but if a 15% loan ($25,000) is taken out on a $169,000 home today, and that home sells for $750,000 10 years later, you will owe about $342,000 to Rex ($25,000 original loan + $15,000 service charge + $302,000 for 52% shared equity).

While it may serve its purpose for some cases, I would not call it King of anything, let alone of reverse mortgages.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>King?   I don&#8217;t think so.</p>
<p>Rex will loan a maximum of 15% of FMV.  They charge a $15,000 service fee at time of sale.   They get an equity share of 3.5% for every 1% they loan you.  No interest accrues, but if you get the maximum of 15%, this can mean up to 52% of your equity over time (15 X 3.5).</p>
<p>In California, this can be a whopper.   Correct me if I am wrong, but if a 15% loan ($25,000) is taken out on a $169,000 home today, and that home sells for $750,000 10 years later, you will owe about $342,000 to Rex ($25,000 original loan + $15,000 service charge + $302,000 for 52% shared equity).</p>
<p>While it may serve its purpose for some cases, I would not call it King of anything, let alone of reverse mortgages.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Is This The King of Reverse Mortgages? &#124; First Finance Loans and Mortgages</title>
		<link>http://www.bestreversemortgage.com/is-this-the-king-of-reverse-mortgages/comment-page-1/#comment-5</link>
		<dc:creator>Is This The King of Reverse Mortgages? &#124; First Finance Loans and Mortgages</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 18 Jun 2007 11:32:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bestreversemortgage.com/reverse-mortgage/is-this-the-king-of-reverse-mortgages/#comment-5</guid>
		<description>[...] Source: Reverse Mortgage Guide  Filed under UK Mortgages by [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Source: Reverse Mortgage Guide  Filed under UK Mortgages by [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

