<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/2.0.5" -->
<rss version="2.0" 
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/">
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: HUD to Congress: Keep Reverse Loan Costs High</title>
	<link>http://www.bestreversemortgage.com/reverse-mortgage/hud-to-congress-keep-reverse-loan-costs-high/</link>
	<description>The Unofficial Guide to Reverse Mortgages</description>
	<pubDate>Sun, 20 Jul 2008 21:44:34 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.0.5</generator>

	<item>
		<title>by: john</title>
		<link>http://www.bestreversemortgage.com/reverse-mortgage/hud-to-congress-keep-reverse-loan-costs-high/#comment-3892</link>
		<pubDate>Sat, 19 Apr 2008 15:58:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.bestreversemortgage.com/reverse-mortgage/hud-to-congress-keep-reverse-loan-costs-high/#comment-3892</guid>
					<description>The loan origination fees for reverse mortgages are grossly excessive and borderline criminal. If they remain the same then once again theconsumer is being ripped off BIG YIME. Does any one care? HUD has a lien on the house that is worth far more than the loan with the potential of property increasing in value. 1.5 percent origination fee
 is a very dquate.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The loan origination fees for reverse mortgages are grossly excessive and borderline criminal. If they remain the same then once again theconsumer is being ripped off BIG YIME. Does any one care? HUD has a lien on the house that is worth far more than the loan with the potential of property increasing in value. 1.5 percent origination fee<br />
 is a very dquate.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
</channel>
</rss>
