<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/2.0.5" -->
<rss version="2.0" 
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/">
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: HUD To Lenders: Okay To Pay HECM Counselors</title>
	<link>http://www.bestreversemortgage.com/reverse-mortgage/hud-to-lenders-okay-to-pay-hecm-counselors/</link>
	<description>The Unofficial Guide to Reverse Mortgages</description>
	<pubDate>Fri,  4 Jul 2008 03:43:28 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.0.5</generator>

	<item>
		<title>by: Kiplinger&#8217;s Looks At Reverse Mortgages &#124; Reverse Mortgage Guide</title>
		<link>http://www.bestreversemortgage.com/reverse-mortgage/hud-to-lenders-okay-to-pay-hecm-counselors/#comment-2443</link>
		<pubDate>Wed, 06 Feb 2008 19:04:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.bestreversemortgage.com/reverse-mortgage/hud-to-lenders-okay-to-pay-hecm-counselors/#comment-2443</guid>
					<description>[...] That said, there plainly needs to be better oversight with regard to sales practices, related sales and counseling. The idea that lenders can pay for counseling is an obvious and overt conflict. Or, as Kiplinger gently puts it, &#8220;sometimes counseling is paid for by the lender, raising questions about impartiality.&#8221; [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[&#8230;] That said, there plainly needs to be better oversight with regard to sales practices, related sales and counseling. The idea that lenders can pay for counseling is an obvious and overt conflict. Or, as Kiplinger gently puts it, &#8220;sometimes counseling is paid for by the lender, raising questions about impartiality.&#8221; [&#8230;]
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
</channel>
</rss>
